Over half the world’s governments agreed last week to a ban on cluster munitions. But not the United States. Our government not only skipped the deliberations, but continues to defend its policy of keeping and using these deadly weapons.
Why won’t America join the movement to ban cluster munitions? Our executive director Sarah Holewinski sat down with a premier expert to find out.
Marc Garlasco is senior military analyst at Human Rights Watch and a board member of CIVIC. He was instrumental in getting the ban passed and was there at its signing.
Sarah: The US says it can’t support the Convention on Cluster Munitions because its military then couldn’t help countries devastated by tsunamis and earthquakes. Is this true?
Marc: This is circular reasoning at its best. First of all, what humanitarian operation uses cluster munitions? The real issue is US ships have cluster munitions on them, and the US was worried their allies who did sign the Convention could no longer work with it because of that. But this is a non-issue. No humanitarian or peacekeeping operation has ever been barred because of weapons.
Take the landmine ban treaty, for example. The US didn’t sign that and yet has worked together with allies like the UK (who did sign it) for years. What’s more, this new Convention allows for those kinds of partnerships, whether cluster munitions are on ships or planes, so this is a non-issue.
Sarah: But the US says it needs cluster munitions to defend the country. Do we really need them?
Marc: We haven’t used them since 2003, so let’s just say they’re obviously not indispensable when fighting a war. There are plenty of other weapons that can defend the country and not indiscriminately kill and maim civilians, who represent the vast majority of victims.
Sarah: The US says it won’t “unilaterally get rid of” clusters.
Marc: The Cluster Munitions Conventions is nowhere near a unilateral effort. There are 111 countries who have agreed to destroy their stockpiles and not use these horrible weapons again, including key NATO allies like the UK, Germany, France, and Canada. If they can do it, so can the United States.
Sarah: So, as a nation, we’re really behind the 8-ball here, aren’t we?
Marc: Couldn’t have said it better myself.
To learn more about the impact of cluster munitions on civilian populations, and to take action on this issue, click here.
Filed under: Guest Blogger, Interview, Marc Garlasco, Sarah, international | Tagged: War, weapons, civilian casualties, landmines, military, Nato, conflict, civilians, humanitarian, casualties, aid, United States, Dublin, conference, cluster bombs, cluster munitions, France, UK, treaty, arms, international, convention, Canada, Germany, Cluster Munitions Conventions, Cluster Muntions Ban, Cluster Munitions Treaty, Dublin Conference, Interview, Human Rights Watch, earthquake, tsunami, landmine treaty, defence, defense, World
